Difference between revisions of "Newspaper Caper"

From Southern Maryland Wiki @ somd.com
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (External links)
(In The News: Added CNS Story link)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
*http://somd.com/news/headlines/articles/1872.shtml
 
*http://somd.com/news/headlines/articles/1872.shtml
 
*http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32753-2005Apr6.html
 
*http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32753-2005Apr6.html
 +
*http://www.journalism.umd.edu/cns/wire/2005-editions/04-April-editions/050406-Wednesday/PaperCaperWritethru_CNS-UMCP.html

Revision as of 17:49, 31 October 2010

In 1998, Deputies from the St. Mary's County Sheriff's Department attempted to purchase all copies of the Election Day 1998 issue of the newspaper St. Mary's Today. The issue contained a front-page article titled "Fritz Guilty of Rape." St. Mary's County State's Attorney Richard Fritz was running for election.

Mr. Kenneth C. Rossignol, publisher of the St. Mary's Today, filed a lawsuit in 1999 alleging violations of civil rights and freedom of speech. Defendants included State's Attorney Richard Fritz, Former Sheriff Richard Voorhar, and several Sheriff's Deputies. In April 2005, the county's insurance trust agreed to settle the suit and pay $425,000. Richard Fritz was to pay $10,000 in addition to that amount.

The case was originally heard in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt (Rossignol v. Voorhaar, 199 F. Supp. 2d 279, 286-89 (2002)). The district court ruled in favor of the defendants on the grounds that they had not acted under the color of state law. The case was then appealed. The court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Cicuit is located at http://images.somd.com/docs/Rossignol_v_Voorhaar_021326.P.pdf. It contains a pertinent details of the case and is a worthwhile read.

In The News